Showing posts with label Campaign to Protect Rural England. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Campaign to Protect Rural England. Show all posts

Friday, 25 April 2014

Does The CPRE Represent Countryfolk or Countryfauk?

Whilst corresponding with John Glen MP on the subject of the A303 traffic problems and the Campaign to Protect Rural England's stance on the need to improve the road, we were inspired to dream up a new word - Countryfauk.

Why?  Well, we were so surprised about the CRPRE's comments, we looked a little deeper into what they were doing, as you would expect that we should have a lot of common ground.   Superficially, that view is correct.  Living and working in the countryside we share many common interests with the CPRE in the countryside itself, farming and rural industry, housing and rural planning, energy and waste management.



However, when you scratch away the surface veneer, you find a huge difference.  There are those who realise that since man was a hunter-gatherer (and what better place to talk about such things as here, in the shadow of Stonehenge) the relationship of man with the countryside has been one of constant and massive change.  Change that was essential to the life and development not only of the local communities, but the whole country and our national and international interests.  Most folk who live and work in the countryside seem to understand that need for change intuitively and embrace it.   We call them countryfolk.

On the other hand, you have those who wish to preserve an unchanging and unchangeable version of an idealised view of what the English countryside should be - and impose that view on everyone else.  It seems that many in the CPRE might fall into that category; and particularly when it comes to roads.



Many supporters of this philosophy don't actually live in the countryside, you can't really class those who have second homes here, or who only visit once in a Preston Guild, as true countryfolk.  Wearing a flat cap, or green wellies, or driving a Land Rover round central London doesn't make you countryfolk either.  We get the feeling that too many of those pushing these ideas of chocolate box stasis and preservation might better be described as countryfauk; faux countryfolk who are apt to be the first to complain about mud/rain/grass/smells, etc in the countryside.  The ones who bemoan the lack of "culture".  The first to moan to parish councils about the noise of crowing cockerels, the first to start petitions to halt the chiming of rural clocks and those whose whines outdo the Sunday tintinnabulators - whose hobby they would stop. In other words, the archetypal rural NIMBYs.  



Must come as shock to countryfauk that many countryfolk actually embrace rural change.  Some of us are even IMBYs.

Thursday, 24 April 2014

CPRE Ostrich Has Head Stuck in Sand for A Decade

There's an interesting, though somewhat depressing article in today's (April 24th 2014) Daily Telegraph entitled "Stonehenge tunnel plans could be revived".  The article is by the Telegraph's Transport Correspondent, Nick Collins and is in response to the Department for Transport's  A303/A30/A358 Corridor Feasibility Study Scope Document which you can find here.  I strongly suggest that you read it for yourselves as I fear Mr Collins has misrepresented some of it in his article.




What is more disturbing are the comments of the CPRE below:

"The Campaign to Protect Rural England said several of the spots under examination, including Stonehenge, are only congested at certain times of year and do not merit major development.
Ralph Smyth, senior transport campaigner for the CPRE, said: “The traffic [at Stonehenge] hasn’t increased in the last 10 years and it does not justify the huge cost of a tunnel.”
A long tunnel would at least be preferable to a dual carriageway at the surface, which could cause the historic site to lose its world heritage status, he added".  



I'm not sure where they have been for the last 10 years, but as anyone who lives alongside the A303, or drives along it regularly, to say that the traffic at Stonehenge hasn't increased over the last 10 years is risible.  It's worse than that, it's damned dangerous.  Opinion is one thing and evidence quite another.  I would strongly suggest that Ralph Smyth takes a bit of time to read traffic flow data and projections before he makes any further pronouncements.  In particular, he should take a look at Somerset County Council's excellent Economic Impact Study and the figures contained therein, not to mention the traffic studies conducted on behalf of Wiltshire Council and English Heritage.

If you want to take this up with the CPRE directly, then their contact details are:

National Office
Campaign to Protect Rural England
5-11 Lavington Street
London
SE1 0NZ

Tel: 020 7981 2800
Fax: 020 7981 2899

Email: info@cpre.org.uk