Stonehenge: What English Heritage Told Wiltshire Council They Would Do To Discharge Planning Conditions - Then What They Failed To Do!

Over the last few weeks we have highlighted our concerns that English Heritage might have failed to discharge their obligations in relation to the planning conditions imposed on them by Wiltshire Council, in allowing the construction of the new visitor's centre at Stonehenge, which opened in December 2013.

Suspicion is one thing, having evidence is something else entirely.  Consequently, we submitted a FOIA request to Wiltshire Council using the What Do They Know website to make life easier.   Basically, in granting planning consent, Wiltshire Council had imposed 27 separate conditions that English Heritage were required to adhere to, covering a wide variety of topics associated with the new buldings, the environment and the A344.  It would have been unreasonable for us to have asked about them all given our interests, so we restricted ourselves to those conditions that dealt directly with the use of the A344 by pedestrians and other users.

Wiltshire Council had told English Heritage to provide detailed plans for how they were going to ensure the planning conditions were met.  Wiltshire Council would then approve these proposals before they were instituted.  All very sensible and logical.

The information we got back from Wiltshire Council was a bit of revelation.  You can download it and study it yourself from here.  Wiltshire Council also indicated that they would put the same information on their website to aid its easy retrieval in the future.  So here, in a nutshell, is what we discovered.

In early 2012, CBA Associates, acting for English Heritage, proposed to Wiltshire Council that the outstanding planning conditions be discharged.  In reply, in two separate letters on 13th and 25th June 2012, Adam Madge of Wiltshire Council Planning Department responded to this proposal, agreeing to the measures English Heritage had put forward to comply with these obligations and in both letters stating:

"I would confirm that the details sent to us in relation to these conditions are acceptable to the local planning authority. The conditions will have been fully discharged when the development is carried out in accordance with these details as submitted.”

In other words, providing English Heritage complied with what they themselves had proposed, they would have satisfied Wiltshire Council.

So let's take a look at a few of the details, using English Heritage's own timetable:


PHASE 1 – STONEHENGE BOTTOM – MARCH 2013 – JUNE 2013


A new permissible route for pedestrians and cyclists is to be installed with the section that crosses the A344 being reinforced with a plastic ground reinforcement grid and defined by a low barrier, such as a rope barrier to stop visitors walking on the establishing areas of grass.



FAILED: Although the ground reinforcement was installed as planned, no route was marked until late summer 2014.  Even now, the route marking is all a bit half-hearted and may be incorrect.


PHASE 2B – ENTRANCE CONFIGURATION – LATE SEPTEMBER 2013


On the A344 west of Byway 12 a section of the A344 is removed and reinforced hardwearing turf established. Site hording, such as Heras fencing is erected prior to the works beginning and is replaced by a temporary barrier/fence on its completion. These areas of hardwearing grass will be released in Sumer 2016.

New gates, Kent carriage gap and fences are to be installed at the intersection of Byway 12 and the A344.


FAILED:  The following diagram shows what EH said they would install - Kent Carriage Gaps of the dimensions we have harped on about several times:

This is a bit hard to see, so here is the detail:

The design of the Kent Carriage Gaps, proposed by EH and accepted by Wiltshire Council, was:

You may also note in the plan above, that EH were supposed to provide cycle racking by certain deadlines they themselves had proposed:



Cycle Parking and Storage Provision at the Western End of the retained A344

10 no. bicycle racks to accommodate the parking/storage of 20 cycles will be provided in the location shown on drawing 10110301-T-GA003. These will be installed during works to the A344 in a 12 week construction period currently scheduled to commence on 06/03/2013 and complete on 05/06/2013.

FAILED


 Cycle Parking Provision at the Eastern End of the retained A344

5 no. bicycle racks to accommodate the parking of 10 cycles will be provided in the location shown on drawing 10110301-T-GA005. These will be installed during the construction of the Hub Building and Visitor Transit System Drop-Off/Pick Up area in a 24 week construction period currently scheduled to commence on 09/10/2013 and complete on 08/04/2014.

FAILED

Work should have also been carried out last year at the intersection of Byway 12 with the A344

The intersection of the A344 and Byway 12 and road surfaces of both the north and south approaches of Byway 12 will be planed and resurfaced with tarmac. A traffic management programme will be carried out while these works are being completed to allow traffic along the A344 as needed.

FAILED: EH have failed to install Kent Carriage Gaps, gates and cattle grids at the intersection.  Anyone would think they were holding back in case Byway 12 was closed!
Where things get really confusing is in relation to the permissive path for cyclists and pedestrians between Byway 12 and Stonehenge Bottom.  English Heritage, in proposing to discharge planning condition 11 noted to Wiltshire Council in a general statement:


A permissive path (for pedestrians and cyclists) will be available on National Trust land immediately north of the Stonehenge monument running along the line of the former A344 between Byway 12 and Stonehenge Bottom.

Completely unambiguous, what was reported by the Press at the time, completely reasonable, but NOT what English Heritage actually intended.  Between now and 2016, the temporary permissive route will follow its current course:

It follows the northern side of the stopped-up A344 to a new gate in the northern stock fence, crosses through the stock fence into the National Trust open access land.  Now here is the idiocy.  Once you are through the gate, you don't need to stick to the path and indeed one of the points the National Trust often make about this type of open access land is that they prefer people didn't all keep to one path, as it does less damage to the terrain.  So having permission to use a path over land over which you have permission to roam does seem a wee bit superfluous.  But it is, allegedly, only a temporary arrangement.


PHASE 4 – STONEHENGE BOTTOM – SUMMER 2016

The existing/temporary stock fence and gates to the north of the original A344 are to be removed and turf used to patch any resulting disturbances in the grass surface. The areas of the permissible route that are formed using the ground reinforcement system are to be removed and patched using turf grown off site.

The permissible route is now along the northern edge of the re-vegetated A344.

PARTIAL FAIL: The unambiguous brief answer provided by EH was highly misleading.  The detailed answer may turn out to be correct, but we wont know until 2016.

We said at the outset that we had only asked about a few of the planning conditions that were imposed by Wiltshire Council, but our findings are worrying as it suggests there may be a systematic problem with the way these have been dealt with by English Heritage.  It also highlights what some might perceive as a lack of diligence on the part of Wiltshire Council's Planning Department.  The question has to be asked as to why they haven't been closely monitoring work at what must be one of Wiltshire Council's most prestigious locations and one of national and international importance.

We've now fed this back to Wiltshire Council.  They need to put their house in order - and do it quickly.  Only then might we see the quality of development at Stonehenge that English Heritage promised and that so farm they have singularly failed to deliver.