Yesterday was one of those days. First, some sort of post New Year
brainstorm had affected several people in relation to the A303. Back on
the 16th of December, Highways England had posted a Tweet on their A303 Twitter
feed showing that it was quicker to leave the A303 at Countess
Roundabout, travel north to the Packway, then west through Larkhill;
finally turning South at Rollestone Crossroads, over the Airnman's
Cross roundabout at the entrance to the Stonehenge visitor centre before
finally rejoining the A303 at Longbarrow Roundabout.
As far as we are aware, this
is a very long-standing diversionary route for when the A303 comes to a
standstill; particularly in the case of accidents. It's also a fact of life that most modern and up to date SatNavs would offer this alternative, when traffic delays on the A303 exceed a certain level.
In fact, this route
was the only possible route west a few days later on 23rd December,
following a dreadful fatal accident. So the reality is that Highways
England was, unwittingly perhaps, doing a great service by pointing out
the diversion. Moreover, the diversion offered goes through no local
villages, touching only the outskirts of Durrington and passing through
the military town of Larkhill. In particular, it goes nowhere near the
village of Shrewton
What happened next was rather
bizarre and surprising as BBC Wiltshire ran a story conflating the
Highways England Tweet, with the results of a traffic census run in
Shrewton a couple of months earlier. The clear thrust of this radio
news item and subsequent newspaper articles was that the Highways Agency
Tweet had driven traffic into and through Shrewton and other local
villages - utter baloney.
Only people leaving the A303 and disregarding
the Highways Agency alternative could have ended up in Shrewton - most
likely these were either folks relying on out of date SatNavs or locals
avoiding the A303.
So the articles have been
disingenuous in the extreme and by being so have actively detracted from
the real problem of rat-running in Shrewton - the need to re-engineer
Rollestone Crossroads to deter the majority of those now using the B3086
west of Rollestone from doing so, and to encourage them to follow the
route shown above. Traffic calming measures into Shrewton on the B3086 are also desperately needed. Now that really would reduce rat running in local villages and these measiures are needed NOW. If only Wiltshire Council would de-digitate!
Second, after all this idiocy we did get a bit of real news at a STAG meeting yesterday evening. The A303 consultation is about to begin.
For far too long Winterbourne Stoke and other villages in the area have been blighted by the A303 traffic problems. Now a bypass seems imminent and the emphasis has shifted to make sure we get the best route preference the village.
Showing posts with label Durrington. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Durrington. Show all posts
Friday, 6 January 2017
Friday, 25 July 2014
Four Thousand Holes in Blackburn Lancashire, Four Hundred Cameras Around Shrewton, Wiltshire
I do have to apologise to the memory of the late and great John Lennon for abusing the lyrics of "A Day in the Life" but I simply couldn't resist drawing the analogy.
Yesterday, the Salisbury Journal published a very interesting article on the A303 entitled simply: "A303 traffic survey to be carried out"
Basically, the story explains that Atkins, the traffic management consultancy will be placing number plate recognition cameras along the A303 and on surrounding roads as part of a scheme to track vehicle movements on the traffic-choked highway.The Journal article claims that there will be hundreds of these cameras on the surrounding roads, but we suspect that this might be something of an exaggeration and that perhaps 10-20 NPR cameras might be closer to the mark.
Winterbourne Stoke resident, Chairman of the parish council and Wiltshire councillor Ian West observed: "Residents of Shrewton believe the speed and volume of traffic in Shrewton has been made worse by the closure of the A344.
One of the main concerns expressed by local residents is the speed and volume of traffic, it is quoted as one of the main safety factors which people see as a barrier to travelling around their communities on foot or by bicycle or to letting children travel independently. This has very much affected the quality of life in Shrewton.
We very much look forward to the results of the Atkins survey because the increase in traffic is becoming unbearable in Shrewton and the surrounding villages both sides of the A303.”
Of course, it isn't just Shrewton or indeed the residents here in Winterbourne Stoke who are suffering as a result of the A344 closure. We (WiSBAng) and the Stonhenge Traffic Action Group (STAG), regularly hear of problems being caused as far afield as Berwick St James, Larkhill, Durrington, Bulford and Amesbury.
Although we wholeheartedly welcome this new initiative and data-gathering exercise, we feel duty-bound to point out something that some might think verges on negligence on the part of Wiltshire Council. Over the last two decades and more, every bit of traffic modelling undertaken on the A303 corridor, some of it commissioned by Wiltshire Council, predicted that there would be traffic chaos in the surrounding villages if the A344 were to be closed BEFORE the A303 was upgraded. For years, Wiltshire Council resisted the closure of the A344 on those grounds, then in 2010/2011 they did an about face and sided with English Heritage in pushing for the closure.
Surprise, surprise. The A344 was closed and all the traffic models were proved correct.
Now any competent authority would have undertaken a survey such as that being carried out by Atkins between Monday, August 4th and Sunday, August 10th prior to closing the A344, then do the same again after the closure to ensure the changes had had no adverse effects and to be able to quantify the changes with hard data. That would have been far too sensible and of course it might have run the risk of exposing, in irrefutable terms, that a mistake had been made in closing the A344 prematurely. That would never do, would it?
As it is, when Atkins report their findings we will know how bad the situation on all these local roads is, but in the absence of knowing what they were like in quantitative terms before the A344 closure, it is impossible to say how much worse they have become. We can make some estimates based on earlier surveys, but on fewer roads, using somewhat different methodologies; that's far from ideal.
Yesterday, the Salisbury Journal published a very interesting article on the A303 entitled simply: "A303 traffic survey to be carried out"
Basically, the story explains that Atkins, the traffic management consultancy will be placing number plate recognition cameras along the A303 and on surrounding roads as part of a scheme to track vehicle movements on the traffic-choked highway.The Journal article claims that there will be hundreds of these cameras on the surrounding roads, but we suspect that this might be something of an exaggeration and that perhaps 10-20 NPR cameras might be closer to the mark.
Winterbourne Stoke resident, Chairman of the parish council and Wiltshire councillor Ian West observed: "Residents of Shrewton believe the speed and volume of traffic in Shrewton has been made worse by the closure of the A344.
One of the main concerns expressed by local residents is the speed and volume of traffic, it is quoted as one of the main safety factors which people see as a barrier to travelling around their communities on foot or by bicycle or to letting children travel independently. This has very much affected the quality of life in Shrewton.
We very much look forward to the results of the Atkins survey because the increase in traffic is becoming unbearable in Shrewton and the surrounding villages both sides of the A303.”
Of course, it isn't just Shrewton or indeed the residents here in Winterbourne Stoke who are suffering as a result of the A344 closure. We (WiSBAng) and the Stonhenge Traffic Action Group (STAG), regularly hear of problems being caused as far afield as Berwick St James, Larkhill, Durrington, Bulford and Amesbury.
Although we wholeheartedly welcome this new initiative and data-gathering exercise, we feel duty-bound to point out something that some might think verges on negligence on the part of Wiltshire Council. Over the last two decades and more, every bit of traffic modelling undertaken on the A303 corridor, some of it commissioned by Wiltshire Council, predicted that there would be traffic chaos in the surrounding villages if the A344 were to be closed BEFORE the A303 was upgraded. For years, Wiltshire Council resisted the closure of the A344 on those grounds, then in 2010/2011 they did an about face and sided with English Heritage in pushing for the closure.
Surprise, surprise. The A344 was closed and all the traffic models were proved correct.
Now any competent authority would have undertaken a survey such as that being carried out by Atkins between Monday, August 4th and Sunday, August 10th prior to closing the A344, then do the same again after the closure to ensure the changes had had no adverse effects and to be able to quantify the changes with hard data. That would have been far too sensible and of course it might have run the risk of exposing, in irrefutable terms, that a mistake had been made in closing the A344 prematurely. That would never do, would it?
As it is, when Atkins report their findings we will know how bad the situation on all these local roads is, but in the absence of knowing what they were like in quantitative terms before the A344 closure, it is impossible to say how much worse they have become. We can make some estimates based on earlier surveys, but on fewer roads, using somewhat different methodologies; that's far from ideal.
Labels:
A303,
A344,
Amesbury,
Atkins,
Bulford,
Durrington,
Highways Agency,
Larkhill,
Salisbury Journal,
Shrewton,
Shrewton Traffic Action Group,
Wiltshire Council,
Winterbourne Stoke,
WiSBAng
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



