The Danger Of Longbarrow Roundabout Suddenly Gets Very Personal

We at the Stonehenge Traffic Action Group (STAG) have been warning for some time about the dangers of the traffic flows around the Longbarrow Roundabout at the junction between the A303 and the A360, just to the west of Stonehenge.  We've raised these dangers with the Highways Agency and despite several re-designs, the roundabout is still not fit for purpose and it is impossible to negotiate it sensibly, even at low speed.

A week ago I joined the roundabout travelling westbound on the A303. A fast-moving police 4x4 joined from the northbound A360, turning west onto the A303.  For some reason, he drifted way over to the left - too far left to use the right hand of the two A303 exit lanes, then discovered that he was undertaking a car that was in the correct exit lane and almost rear-ending the car ahead of him.  If Wiltshire's Finest can't handle Longbarrow Roundabout...???????

Yesterday evening, those dangers got very personal and very real. My wife was involved in a nasty little accident when a car travelling at high-speed westbound on the A303, left that road and collided with two stationary cars waiting to join the A303 from the northbound A360

This is how it unfolded.  My wife was travelling north on the A360 and had stopped in the left-hand lane at Longbarrow Roundabout, handbrake on and well behind the white dotted line, waiting for a gap in the traffic so she could pull out, turn left and head down the A303 to Winterbourne Stoke and home.

A silver Skoda estate was also waiting to pull out onto the roundabout in the lane to her right; presumably to either turn right towards Andover or to head up towards Airman's Cross.  Again, as with my wife, he was well behind the white line.

It was at this point that a young chap in a 2012-registered VW Golf careened on to Longbarrow Roundabout from the A303, travelling westwards from Andover and seemingly intent on carrying on along the A303 westwards.  Whether through poor roundabout design, excessive speed, piss-poor driving or a combination of all three, the westbound driver lost control of his car, which left the A303 and struck the central reservation of the A360.  It bounced over the central reservation and hit the Skoda in the drivers door.

The impact was so great that the Skoda spun round through 90 degrees and its nose struck the Yaris, being driven by my wife, just behind the drivers door.  A few inches further forward and it could have been so much worse.  The cause of the accident bounced back into the centre of the three westbound lanes, causing chaos on the westbound carriageway at the height of the evening rush hour.

My wife did the obvious thing and called Wiltshire Police whilst still trapped in the car - as was the Skoda driver.  Let me be charitable, whoever took the call was a complete waste of space.  When my wife said she wasn't obviously injured, the person to whom she was speaking said the police weren't interested and didn't need to be informed.  That might strictly be the case, but anyone who suggests that emergency services aren't needed to deal with a multi-vehicle smash, on a major trunk road,  blocking a roundabout at an accident blackspot, after dusk, is seriously in need of a trip to the job centre to find an occupation more befitting someone of their limited mental capacity.

COMMENT: It seems that it is Wiltshire Police Policy to not get involved in "non-injury" accidents.  I have to say that relying on crash victims, who may be in shock, who may have underlying medical complaints like heart conditions, or who may feel themselves to be in reasonable condition but to have life threatening injuries, to decide if they, or other accident victims have been injured is crass in the extreme.

My wife and the Skoda driver managed to get out of their vehicles on the passengers side.  Battered, a bit bruised perhaps and, in my wife's case, with a nasty friction burn from the seat-belt across her throat, but thankfully no major injuries.

Eventually, wiser council prevailed and all three emergency services attended the scene.  My wife was checked over by a passing hospital consultant,  a paramedic and an ambulance was also called up.  The Fire Brigade were also needed to check for fuel spills, but also to check the cars to see if the air-bags were in danger of functioning spontaneously - odd things sometimes happen to them in side impacts.  They told my wife her car was unsafe to drive.  Finally Wiltshire Police turned up and established the chain of events; if not the absolute cause.  Thanks though to the policeman who brought my wife home - it made up for the nonsense in the control room!

Here is the policeman looking at the skid marks on the road and central reservation, his torch in the lower one showing just how far the westbound driver had intruded onto the northbound A360.

The Skoda driver had a remarkable escape.  The door hasn't been removed, it has been shoved straight into the drivers seat space.  He clearly leads a charmed life!

It was a bit too dark to see the side of the Yaris last night, but this morning when we went to pick up the last of our bits and pieces from the car at the recovery yard near Warminster:

Not a massive dent in the greater scheme of things, but the side is intruding into the rear passenger compartment and with no side air bags....


...at least it didn't get rammed through the drivers door.  It's not clear whether this is repairable or not.  The consensus last night was that it was likely to be a total loss given the age of the car, location of the damage, etc.  But it would be nice if it was repairable - we really don't want to have to buy another car this month!  Still, at the end of the day it is only metal.

But, I end with a question.  How many more completely avoidable accidents must there be before the Highways Agency get of their idle backsides and get this junction sorted out?  Even if the go-ahead is given to dual the A303 past Stonehenge tomorrow, we are going to have to deal with this mess at Longbarrow Roundabout for a further 6 -10 years.

As a STAG member observed last night: "A campaigning journalist could have a field day with what's gone on here. "  Not only what went on yesterday evening, but what goes on nearly every day of the week at Longbarrow Roundabout.  I really don't want to be writing about a fatality there in a day, a week, a month or a year's time with bugger-all having been done.

Stonehenge: A Few Scary Moments On The A303 At Stonehenge Bottom

Earlier today, I went for a bike ride to clear my head and for the last part, I rode north-eastwards along Byway 12, to the A303.  Crossing the A303 is never easy and you need to have your wits about you.  Putting it bluntly, when you cross the A303 here, you have to remember that the great travelling public aren't really thinking that they might encounter people by the roadside.  Why on earth would there be people close to one of the wonders of the World; I ask you?

As a consequence of this, anyone attempting to cross the A303 at Byway 12, Byway 11 or Stonehenge Bottom has to regard themselves as a slice of ham about to be sandwiched between two pieces of steel-reinforced "bread" with a closing speed in excess of 120 mph.  Get it wrong and it is going to hurt - briefly, bloodily and almost certainly, finally.

At Byway 12, you have to wait until you can't see vehicles in either direction to have enough time to stroll, not run, across the A303.  Running isn't advised, as if you were to fall, you simply wouldn't have time to pick yourself up before the Grim Sandwich Maker appeared.  On quiet days, you might have to wait a couple of minutes for a safe gap - there aren't many quiet days any more!  On a bad day, you might have to wait 10-15 minutes or even longer to cross in reasonable safety, or simply give it up as a bad job and back track. Too many lose patience and take silly risks...

Today wasn't too bad and I was safely across in under a minute.  I rode up to the A344 then onto the temporary permissive path between Byway 12 and Stonehenge Bottom.  As I crested the ridge down to Stonehenge Bottom I was confronted by a veritable gaggle of cyclists heading down towards the A303.

They were a nice friendly bunch and I explained that I was part of STAG and what we were about and please could I take photos of them if they were trying to cross.  They were happy for me to do so, so here is a short vignette of what happened next.

The thought of them all trying to cross made my blood run a bit cold as the traffic here is gravity-assisted in both directions and the westbound traffic is still trying to settle scores with other drivers from the 2 lanes into 1 section of the A303, a few hundred meters to the east.

A few cyclists at the front of the group spotted a small gap and either ran or rode across.

Most of them didn't get the opportunity and there was  steady stream of fast-moving traffic in both directions on what is, at this point a Clearway, not that anyone gives a tuppeny-damn about the Highway Code these days!

They waited, and waited, and waited.

When a westbound gap appeared they moved forward, then back again as it disappeared.

One of them made it to the central strip and an eastbound driver in a grey car slowed and stopped.  Remember, it is a Clearway - no stopping.

The cyclists, not quite sure what to do now, all started to move off the verge towards the centre of the A303,  but did so very hesitantly.  The westbound traffic was still thundering past them with mere inches to spare.  It couldn't have been a very pleasant experience.

White van man from Black Hole Storage Removals clearly didn't give a damn and went roaring through and this carried on for a while until another grey car stopped on the westbound carriageway.

and finally, the whole group got across safely.

It could so easily have been very different.  But why are things so dangerous?

Well, the people who control the World Heritage Site have a policy of making Stonehenge a more bike (and horse and pedestrian) friendly place.  This seemed to be borne-out in the plans for the new visitor's centre submitted by English Heritage.  However, despite their intentions and despite planning conditions that mandated a whole raft of measures that would have improved things for cyclists, English Heritage have singularly failed to deliver.

One of the few things that was largely outside the control of English Heritage was an improved crossing at Stonehenge Bottom.  On the one hand,  increased usage of the crossing point was anticipated by all parties after the closure of the A344, hence the planning requiremnt.  However, a spoke was put in the works by the Highways Agency who produced a report - in the way Government Agencies do when they don't want to take action.  The conclusion of this report reads as follows:

"It is the designer’s view that the current usage of this crossing by pedestrians or by cyclists, on either the A303 or the A344 routes, does not justify the increased risk to motorised users on the A303 of providing refuge islands for this crossing. However it is felt that the opportunity to relocate the crossing to the best location position for NMU visibility and to reduce the crossing width is justified and should be taken.

In taking this view, the designer is taking note of RSA team preference, based on pedestrian rather than cycle use of the crossing, of the do minimum crossing type. The designer is also influenced by the fact that this is far from being the only single carriageway rural at grade crossing of the A303 with no specific NMU facilities, including equestrian crossings. 

The proximity of this crossing to the Stonehenge World Heritage site does not currently attract to it significant NMU usage. It is therefore felt that neither the existing usage of the crossing or the last five year’s accident records warrant a different approach here to that taken at other similar crossing locations where the balance of risks between NMU and Motorised Users, and hence the actual overall risk, dictates the level of provision made. 

It is therefore recommended that the measures in Option 4 proposals, with the refuge islands removed but all the other measures retained is adopted. 

A future scheme for reviewing the crossing arrangements needs to be submitted and approved. The scheme shall have regard to Design Manual for Roads and Bridges HD 19/03 Stage 4 Safety Audit 12 and 36 month post scheme recommendations for any remedial action. 

It is felt that the extensive investigation already under taken into the examination of the safety of and the changes to the crossing here proposed satisfies the requirements of the planning condition."

Just for the record, NMUs are non-motorised units - pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders.  Cutting out all the crap, what they are actually saying is that the body-count at Stonehenge Bottom is too low to warrant making anything more than superficial changes. However, they go on to suggest that a safety audit at 12 and 36 months might change things if the body count increases.

I don't suppose the contribution by Wiltshire Council helped much either:

"...that in relation to cycle usage their preferred route between the A344 to the north and Amesbury for cyclists was via the countess roundabout underpass crossing of the A303 and than via Lark Hill."  (all the typos and grammatical errors are courtesy of the Highways Agency!)

As usual with Wiltshire Council when it comes to anything in the south of the county - thumbs up bums and brains in neutral all the way.  No-one in their right minds, who knew about the local area, would ever choose to get from the centre of Amesbury to Stonehenge by heading north, through the scrofulous Countess Roundabout underpass (on foot - as cycling is forbidden on this bit of the cycle route), up Countess Road, being harassed by rat-running motorists, then head west to Larkhill along the rat-run of choice for coaches and HGVs, before eventually getting to the northern end of Byway 12.

Most sensible folk will simply head out to West Amesbury, up to the A303 and then to Stonehenge Bottom and the A344 - no need to ride with high speed traffic at all - just dice with death crossing the A303.  That's what they've always done, that's what they were doing today and that's what they will do until the A303 issue is resolved once and for all. 

Of course,  there was a fall-back plan to monitor the situation.  Here it is.  Read it carefully and spot the flaw:

STONEHENGE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Planning Application Reference S/2009/1527 

Scheme required under planning condition 27 for reviewing pedestrian and cycle route access arrangements along the whole of the A344, and crossing arrangements at the A303 (Stonehenge Bottom)

Following approval of the details of the pedestrian and cycle route access arrangements along the whole of the A344 and crossing arrangements at the A303 (Stonehenge Bottom), English Heritage will co-operate with the Local Highways Authority, Highways Agency and the Local Planning Authority in reviewing the arrangements. In particular, should a formal Stage 4 Safety Audit be carried out, and any recommendations for remedial action be made in the 12 and 36 month Stage 4 Reports submitted to English Heritage and the other organisations, then any required remedial works, and arrangements for their implementation and funding, will be considered and agreed between English Heritage, the Local Highways Authority, the Local Planning Authority and the Highways Agency, as appropriate. 

In addition, English Heritage will carry out the following:

• -  Incorporate questions about the pedestrian and cycle access into the annual visitor survey conducted by the travel and tourism department of market research company TNS. This will comprise face to face interviews with 180 individuals during the months of July, August and September. Likely questions include: whether people have accessed the site on foot or on bicycle, and, if so, where they have travelled from, how satisfactory they have found the route and where they are travelling onto. 
  
  
• -  As part of the ongoing operational management of the site English Heritage staff will, as a matter of course, record, report to the relevant authorities and, if appropriate, take any necessary action in respect of any incidents or accidents along the route of the A344 between Airman's Corner and Stonehenge Bottom. 
  
  English Heritage 26th April 2012
  

 

Did you spot it?  Yes, that's right.  Most pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders arriving at Stonehenge don't pitch up at the visitor's centre, as there is (still) no provision for them.  They may arrive from east or west, north or south, but we suspect that few, if any, will be invited to take part in the annual visitor survey, conducted for English Heritage by TNS.  

During my many visits to the WHS this July August and September I've never seen anyone with a clipboard interviewing pedestrians, cyclists and the two riders I have seen, nor have I ever been approached.  Now that's interesting, if true because this safety audit is meant to be looking at the safety of crossing the A303 by any and all users, not just English Heritage's paying customers.

As I say, we don't know for certain that this is the case, but I feel an FOIA request ,or two, coming on!