It is very easy, because they have set themselves up as such easy targets for ridicule and derision - and they will be duly ridiculed and derided.
However, whilst we must be resolute in learning the lessons of the past, we need to look to the future and ask ourselves how might the problem be solved. So what is it we want to achieve exactly? Well, here at WiSBAng, we would offer the following list of key points:
- Dual the entire length of the A303 (and the A358 and A30 to Penzance)
- Bypass villages such as Winterbourne Stoke
- Remove the A303 from the Stonehenge World Heritage Site sight-line
- Minimising the need to damage virgin farmland
- Minimising the cost
- In doing all of the above, eliminating rat-running through local villages.
However, we need to look at some of the limiting factors:
- The location of the World Heritage Site itself
- The location of Parsonage Down site
- The high cost of stuffing the A303 in a tunnel
- The unsuitability of the WHS geology for stuffing the A303 in a tunnel.
There are a few other factors that need to be borne in mind.
-The Armed Forces are retrenching to Wiltshire from Germany and are planning to accommodate a further 3,500-4,000 people, including families, at Larkhill, but:
- The Armed Forces have reduced massively in size since the heyday of activity in the Salisbury Plain training area;
- Not all of the Salisbury Plain Training Area is in use all of the time - so, very simplistically, it can't all be needed.
- The land occupied by the Salisbury Plain Training Area is already in government ownership or leasehold.
- The military population is largely transient - they come, they are posted, they go.
- Whatever route west is taken for the A303 - it is going to destroy/damage some archaeology.
- Most routes that have been proposed to date go through virgin countryside, or go so far south that they will start to have undesirable adverse impacts on the traffic flow in and around Salisbury.
- Whatever route west is taken, it will require some virgin countryside.
- Much of the virgin countryside that would need to be sacrificed to reroute the A303, especially on the routes previously proposed, is owned by rich and influential individuals who can be expected to object a wee bit.
- The Green lobby might also object a little - think 'Winchester Bypass.'
So, is there a route that could possibly deal with all, or most of the above? We think so, and here it is:
Just click on the picture to see the enlarged view. Basically, the proposed route leaves the current A303 at the Parkhouse Roundabout, cuts northwest into MoD land and then heads due west, north of Bulford and Larkhill. It then continues westwards until it reaches a point on the A360, roughly equidistant between Shrewton and Tilshead, before cutting back to the south west to rejoin the A303 at the Wylye junction. As I write, I can hear the wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth in MoD - it's going to mess up the small-arms- ranges between Bulford and Tidworth and cut the two camps apart - but there is a helluva lot of training area and rifle/grenade ranges can be resited - how hard is it to build a berm? Then think of the benefits to MoD - most civilian traffic could be removed from Larkhill - benefiting the newly returned families and making a much clearer distinction between the living area and the training area. Unexploded ordnance along the route- well, there's bound to be some, but what a wonderful training opportunity.
There is one other huge benefit in going this far north, and that is the possibility of joining into the A36 at Knook Camp, close to the Warminster bypass - and possibly providing some relief to the A36 villages - at least from traffic travelling to or from the east of England. Like this:
OK, it's far from ideal, but it is the route which requires the minimum purchase of undeveloped countryside and achieves just about everyone's desired outcomes. The A303 proposal turns a 14.4 mile section of road into one 17 miles long - adding less than 3 minutes to the journey time. Compare that with the 1-3 hours that 14 mile stretch has taken this summer.
Let the cries of outrage begin!
12 comments:
It is certainly an idea worthy of consideration. One of the big attractions for me, as a haulier, is that virtually all of the work coul be conducted with minimal disturbance to the current A303 until it was virtually complete - a major factor if businesses in the West Country are to support the plan.
Yes, you are quite right, it could. Just about every other plan I have ever seen would cause complete chaos along the existing route, driving even more traffic onto the northern rat runs and along the A36.
This is a sensible plan with a logical and sweeping solution. There is not much to object to. The infringement of the MOD land is minimal and the benefits to MOD people will be worthwhile. It is inexpensive compared to other "solutions". However the recently announced plan to privatise the Highways Agency could put the dead hand of indecision upon it. This is where John Glenn can show his leadership, or fail to do so.
My biggest fear is that Wiltshire Council will rush ahead in their approval of MoD Re-basing plans for the Salisbury Plain Training Area, without thinking about their inter-relationship with any plan that might emerge over the next few months to dual the A303. Like it or not, even if my proposal wasn't adopted, the MoD plans are going to have a significant impact on local roads and the A303. In my view, even though the plans for new quarters, renovation of existing quarters and other infrastructure to support the Army are essential and long overdue, it would be inappropriate for the MoD to be given the go-ahead for their £850 million spend until these impacts are assessed in conjunction with plans for the A303.
Salisbury Plain is the only location in the UK where small to medium armoured formations can train and manoeuvre without causing too many difficulties for the civilian population.
That is a very good point and clearly it would be undesirable to have any real adverse impacts on the range and scope of Army training. That said, it is hard to see how the loss of a dual-carriageway wide strip of land on the very edge of the Salisbury Plain Training Area is going to have any major consequences.
General Disquiet, this is the best thought out route so far but how do we get the Highways Agency to take heed when they seem to be in the pocket of English Heritage who have their heads in the proverbial sand or (chalk) in our case and have continual tunnel vision! Best wishes McFluzie
Well McFluzie, I guess all we can do is ensure that we put all the options forward, every time we meet with any officials who have anything to do with the A303 - from the Highways Agency/Department for Transport, Wiltshire Council, English Heritage, English Nature, Parliament or the European Parliament.
I'm thinking of buying a house in the area and having contacted the highweays agency have been told thatg work on the Winterbourne Stoek bypass is due to start in Autumn 2014 but that they still haven't decided on the exact route. Does anybody have a rough idea of the route and what impact this will have on road noise in the area? Will there be a cutting to reduce noise?
I've just heard on good authority that the government have given the go a head to dual the section of A30 at Bodmin Moor - 2.8 miles. My source has gone down there today Thursday, for work in his particular field, having received a phonecall from the main contractor!
Now that is an interesting bit of news. It makes you wonder why we need yet another feasibility study when things are going ahead anyway.
Dear Anonymous - if only work was going to start on a Winterbourne Stoke bypass in 2014...
...although the plans have been drawn up to build a bypass to the north of the village in the past - built on a raised causeway to keep it out of the flood plain of the River Till. Whether it would be effectively sound-proofed is a moot (but not necessarily mute) point.
Post a Comment